Dominicus Gundissalinus and John of Salisbury
All the evidence is also pointing towards the middle of the twelfth
century as the time at which chiromancy first became widely known within Europe. This is
further confirmed by the fact that the terms chiromantia or chiromanticus
are not known at all in any texts earlier than about 1160. The lack of the use of such
terms in Latin works explicitly written to list condemned divinatory practices suggests
quite strongly that chiromancy was unknown before about the middle of the twelfth century.
Moreover, the first known Latin texts to use the term chiromancy were both written about
1160, once again suggesting that chiromancy is a relatively new phenomena at this time.
Dominicus Gundissalinus mentions chiromancy in his
work 'De Divisione Philosophiae', written c1160, in which he discusses the
various forms of divination available at that time, including the new arts of chiromancy
and scapulimancy (divination from cracks formed in the shoulder blades of sheep). However,
he does not seem particularly impressed by it, for he relegates it to his list of
'inferior' methods of divination. His preference is clearly for astrology, as he explains
that divination from the heavenly bodies is by far the most noble form of divination of
all. These writings of Gundissalinus do perhaps suggest an Arabic connection once again;
for Gundissalinus lived and worked in Toledo in Spain which, through Moorish influence,
was one of the foremost centres for Arabic learning at that time. Moreover, although the
source of Gundissalinus' awareness of chiromancy has not been traced, this brief reference
does at least clearly inform us of the approximate dates at which chiromancy first began
to gain interest and attention within European intellectual circles.
John of Salisbury (c1115-1180) also makes a passing
reference to chiromancy in his 'Polycraticus' of 1159. In one section of this
work, he engages in a rather long discussion of the magical arts and presents a somewhat
contemptuous view of both astrology (mathematici) and other divinatory arts such as
pyromancy, aeromancy, hydromancy and geomancy. His discussion of chiromancy is a little
more brief, for he explains that: 'The chiromantici are those who presage the hidden
aspects of things from the inspection of the hands' and that '...chiromancy
professes to discern truths which lie hidden in the wrinkles of the hands, but since there
is no apparent reason for this belief, it is not necessary to contravene it'. The
implication here is that this is a new form of divination which has only recently become
fashionable. He also informs us that Thomas a Beckett, the future Archbishop of
Canterbury, was in the habit of visiting soothsayers and chastises him for having
consulted a chiromancer on the occasion of a Royal Expedition with Henry II in 1157. In
fact, as it is now known, Thomas a Beckett continued to consult diviners even after he had
become Archbishop of Canterbury.
This evidence from the pen of John of Salisbury reveals two important things: firstly,
that some form of chiromantical tradition had already reached England by the middle of the
twelfth century and secondly, that chiromancy was not necessarily viewed in an
unfavourable light by the Church at this time. For, by some strange coincidence, the
earliest extant chiromantic manuscript we now possess dates from around this time. It was
scribed in the religious environment of Canterbury and is to be found within what is
essentially an ecclesiastical text.